Therefore, I am not aware of anything and is it hard to believe that there was a huge bannhammer-like behaviour in the forums and/or from Gaming Minds Studios as such.Įspecially, when it comes to my experience, we have learned a lot from prvious games (not Just Gaming Minds Studios' games, but as well other games we have published since then) and especially, if you have a closer look at Gaming Minds latest game Railway Empire, you will see that we are not just listening to the community, but also made a lot of the (constructive) critics and feedback possible in the game.
Nevertheless, as you have stated, this is a while back, even before I started working for Kalypso Media (no secret, I started 2015 together with the release of Grand Ages: Medieval). That said, then it would still be fair if you delete my comment in the thread here (since that was a duplicate) : Since you make claims on Gaming Minds behalf about behavior in the past Kalypso media fora, then I would like to point out that Gaming Minds in general took a silent position to the abuse of critics in the Kalypso Media fora (or greatly ignored it) - so they left it to their fanboys to crush any opposition to the fan boy butt kiss attitude over there.Īctually, I think that I were asked by some guy - some time back - to leave some feedback - he were 'Producer' or something (it's a while back) which I don't think that he responded to - because I were frank and forthright about what I thought about previous abuse in the Kalypso fora in connection with critique - and I don't think that that were appreciated.Īnyway, until Kalypso Media seriously change their 'game' and their own and developers behavior against critics then I will continue to make people aware of their behavior. What 'I posted here were re-written from scratch - even though it partly carries same message - what were posted in reply to the two news announcements were duplicate message, but not the one that you responded to here. Thank you for noticing and answering to my post. Nonetheless, please step away from posting the same text across several platforms, as I have already replied below your recent post on our news-announcement on the store-page. This thank you for your feedback and great activity lately in those boards. Because i want to see best Port Royale game after to years. I hope you won't regret for your decisions, after to release and sales. We will see the result together, after to game's release. This is my view and the decisions about game are yours. Nevertheless, i can say my things with my experience on Port Royale games as an old pleyer of this series. Yes, i haven't played the Port Royale 4 yet. But you shouldn't disregard to naval battles. Even, you need to add diplomacy and personal relationships factors for diversity in game. I think trade and city building is most important things in Port Royale series. Why people are keep saying Port Royale 2 is better than Port Royale 3? You need to think about that, because biggest difference is battle system between these games.
Naval battles, city sieges from sea or city sieges from land were nice in Port Royale 1 and Port Royale 2. But after to 17 years, Port Royale 1's naval battle system still looking better. Of course you need to add new elements in-game for innovation.
Port royale 4 cat island series#
This is out of Port Royale series spirit after to 3 games in 17 years.Īfter to Port Royale 3's release, more than 7 years, adding more elements like captains etc. Because i felt disappointed when i saw turn-based system. I just watched your pre-alpha gameplay video from Youtube, i saw your new turn-based naval battle system and i wrote this topic.
0 kommentar(er)
